The Council ratified the conservative therapy documentation revision 7-2 with 1 recusal. Effective immediately for new orders. In-flight orders complete against the version they started with. Standards Update Live session announced for Thursday at 4pm ET — open to all community members.
Council Standards Committee·Council artifact · v1.4 · 384kb PDF
CouncilEvidence·2 days ago
STRIDE-2 trial readout: what it means for conservative therapy duration in mixed VLU
Released this morning in Wound Repair and Regeneration. STRIDE-2 examined conservative therapy duration in mixed venous leg ulcer populations across 12 sites (n=847). Headline finding: median time-to-CAMP-eligibility was 31 days, not 45, in the ABI 0.7–0.9 segment with adequate compression adherence. Formal Council review on next month's Standards Sync agenda.
Council Evidence Review·Evidence digest · 4-page summary
CouncilCommentary·5 days ago
Why the We Know Wounds Council operates separately from any product distributor
A short explainer on the structural independence between the editorial Council and any downstream product distribution. We publish standards, screen evidence, and educate; we do not sell or recommend specific manufacturer SKUs. This separation is the foundation of editorial integrity.
Council Chair·Editorial · 6-min read
CouncilStandards·3 weeks ago
Q1 2026 Standards Revision: ARC baseline-locking methodology — published
Council ratified the formal ARC v1.4 baseline-locking methodology. Baselines lock at order placement and ride with the order through the trajectory; mid-trajectory baseline mutation is disallowed (history append only). Published as Council Standard C-ARC-1 v1.4.
Council Standards Committee·Council artifact · v1.4 · 268kb PDF
CouncilEducation·4 weeks ago
May Grand Rounds: defensible documentation for mixed-etiology wounds
Council member Dr. Elena Vasquez walks through the documentation pattern she uses for mixed venous + arterial wounds. Recording posted to the public Classroom archive. The case examples are de-identified and editorially reviewed before posting.
Council Education·Recording · 42 min
CouncilEvidence·6 weeks ago
Bilayer matrix vs single-layer for full-thickness DFU: meta-analysis update
Council evidence team summarized 14 studies (n=2,184) comparing bilayer matrix and single-layer CTP for full-thickness diabetic foot ulcers with exposed structure. Heterogeneity remains high; Council recommendation: defer to local vascular workup and patient-specific trajectory rather than blanket preference.
Council Evidence Review·Evidence digest · 8-page summary
Council clarified the 30-day conservative therapy adherence window for CAMP eligibility, with explicit allowance for documented adherence interruption (hospitalization, vascular workup). Published as C-CAMP-2 v1.2.
Council Standards Committee·Council artifact · v1.2 · 192kb PDF
CouncilCommentary·3 months ago
How the Council handles conflicts of interest: the recusal process
Every Council member files annual conflict-of-interest disclosures covering employment, advisory roles, equity, honoraria, and research funding. When a Standards vote touches a counterparty named in any disclosure, the relevant Council member auto-recuses. Recusals are public — included in every Standards vote tally.